Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments
  • Acts

Bombay High Court Case Commentaries

Section 11 Appointments Not Barred by Pending Section 37 Appeals: Bombay High Court Orders De Novo Arbitration After Set-Aside, Confines Referral Court to Prima Facie Existence of Agreement

Section 11 Appointments Not Barred by Pending Section 37 Appeals: Bombay High Court Orders De Novo Arbitration After Set-Aside, Confines Referral Court to Prima Facie Existence of Agreement

Date: Oct 17, 2025
Section 11 Appointments Not Barred by Pending Section 37 Appeals: Bombay High Court Orders De Novo Arbitration After Set-Aside, Confines Referral Court to Prima Facie Existence of Agreement...
GST Returns Are Confidential: Bombay High Court Holds Section 158 of the GST Act Overrides RTI Requests for Third-Party Tax Records; Section 11 Notice Mandatory

GST Returns Are Confidential: Bombay High Court Holds Section 158 of the GST Act Overrides RTI Requests for Third-Party Tax Records; Section 11 Notice Mandatory

Date: Oct 16, 2025
GST Returns Are Confidential: Section 158 of the GST Act Overrides RTI Requests for Third-Party Tax Records; Section 11 Notice Mandatory Introduction In Writ Petition No. 11135 of 2025, decided on 14...
Right to Safe Roads under Article 21: Immediate Public-Law Compensation for Pothole and Open Manhole Victims; District Compensation Committees and Personal Liability of Officials — Bombay High Court (13 October 2025)

Right to Safe Roads under Article 21: Immediate Public-Law Compensation for Pothole and Open Manhole Victims; District Compensation Committees and Personal Liability of Officials — Bombay High Court (13 October 2025)

Date: Oct 15, 2025
Right to Safe Roads under Article 21: Immediate Public-Law Compensation for Pothole and Open Manhole Victims; District Compensation Committees and Personal Liability of Officials — Bombay High Court...
Directory, Not Mandatory: Bombay High Court Reaffirms Material-Compliance Standard for Co‑operative Housing Redevelopment Under the 2019 GR

Directory, Not Mandatory: Bombay High Court Reaffirms Material-Compliance Standard for Co‑operative Housing Redevelopment Under the 2019 GR

Date: Oct 13, 2025
Directory, Not Mandatory: Bombay High Court Reaffirms Material-Compliance Standard for Co‑operative Housing Redevelopment Under the 2019 GR Introduction This commentary examines the Bombay High...
No Equity in Illegality: Bombay High Court Cancels Ineligible ANM/GNM Admissions, Orders Refunds, Rs.1 Lakh Compensation, and Five-Year Compliance Audit

No Equity in Illegality: Bombay High Court Cancels Ineligible ANM/GNM Admissions, Orders Refunds, Rs.1 Lakh Compensation, and Five-Year Compliance Audit

Date: Oct 10, 2025
No Equity in Illegality: Bombay High Court Cancels Ineligible ANM/GNM Admissions, Orders Refunds, Rs.1 Lakh Compensation, and Five-Year Compliance Audit Court: Bombay High Court (Civil Appellate...
IBC Moratorium Does Not Bar Section 138 NI Act Prosecution of Directors Even When Insolvency Predates Cheque Dishonour

IBC Moratorium Does Not Bar Section 138 NI Act Prosecution of Directors Even When Insolvency Predates Cheque Dishonour

Date: Oct 8, 2025
IBC Moratorium Does Not Bar Section 138 NI Act Prosecution of Directors Even When Insolvency Predates Cheque Dishonour Introduction This commentary examines the oral judgment delivered by the Bombay...
Impending Marriage Is Not a Ground for Bail: Bombay High Court Cancels Perverse Bail Order That Ignored Material Evidence in a Heinous Sexual Offence

Impending Marriage Is Not a Ground for Bail: Bombay High Court Cancels Perverse Bail Order That Ignored Material Evidence in a Heinous Sexual Offence

Date: Oct 1, 2025
Impending Marriage Is Not a Ground for Bail: Bombay High Court Cancels Perverse Bail Order That Ignored Material Evidence in a Heinous Sexual Offence Introduction In a significant ruling that...
Digital Footprints and Layered Transactions as Prima Facie Indicators of Control: Bombay High Court narrows anticipatory bail in alleged fuel adulteration cases under BNSS §482

Digital Footprints and Layered Transactions as Prima Facie Indicators of Control: Bombay High Court narrows anticipatory bail in alleged fuel adulteration cases under BNSS §482

Date: Oct 1, 2025
Digital Footprints and Layered Transactions as Prima Facie Indicators of Control: Bombay High Court narrows anticipatory bail in alleged fuel adulteration cases under BNSS §482 Introduction This...
Jurisdiction First, Amendments Cannot Cure: Bombay High Court (Goa) Directs Simultaneous Consideration of O.7 R.10/11 CPC and Amendment Applications

Jurisdiction First, Amendments Cannot Cure: Bombay High Court (Goa) Directs Simultaneous Consideration of O.7 R.10/11 CPC and Amendment Applications

Date: Sep 26, 2025
Jurisdiction First, Amendments Cannot Cure: Bombay High Court (Goa) Directs Simultaneous Consideration of O.7 R.10/11 CPC and Amendment Applications Introduction In Akshay Quenim v. Royce Savio...
Section 59 Notice Is the “Heart and Soul” of Externment: Non‑service Renders Orders Void; Stale Cases and Non‑Speaking Orders Impermissible — Commentary on Bharat Shatrughna Bhosale v. Divisional Commissioner (Bombay High Court, 2025)

Section 59 Notice Is the “Heart and Soul” of Externment: Non‑service Renders Orders Void; Stale Cases and Non‑Speaking Orders Impermissible — Commentary on Bharat Shatrughna Bhosale v. Divisional Commissioner (Bombay High Court, 2025)

Date: Sep 22, 2025
Section 59 Notice Is the “Heart and Soul” of Externment: Non‑service Renders Orders Void; Stale Cases and Non‑Speaking Orders Impermissible — Commentary on Bharat Shatrughna Bhosale v. Divisional...
Past Cohabitation Is Enough: Bombay High Court Affirms Expansive Section 17 PWDVA Right to Reside; Denial of Access as Economic Abuse; Residence Order Tailored to Will-Based Share

Past Cohabitation Is Enough: Bombay High Court Affirms Expansive Section 17 PWDVA Right to Reside; Denial of Access as Economic Abuse; Residence Order Tailored to Will-Based Share

Date: Sep 22, 2025
Past Cohabitation Is Enough: Bombay High Court Affirms Expansive Section 17 PWDVA Right to Reside; Denial of Access as Economic Abuse; Residence Order Tailored to Will-Based Share Introduction This...
Unrealistic Guaranteed Returns = Prima Facie Cheating: Bombay High Court’s BNS-era benchmark for denying anticipatory bail in investment‑inducement cases

Unrealistic Guaranteed Returns = Prima Facie Cheating: Bombay High Court’s BNS-era benchmark for denying anticipatory bail in investment‑inducement cases

Date: Sep 22, 2025
Unrealistic Guaranteed Returns = Prima Facie Cheating: Bombay High Court’s BNS-era benchmark for denying anticipatory bail in investment‑inducement cases Introduction This commentary analyzes the...
Liberal, Natural-Justice–Centric Standard for Setting Aside Section 256 CrPC Acquittals in Cheque-Dishonour Cases: Bombay High Court Restores Complaint with Costs

Liberal, Natural-Justice–Centric Standard for Setting Aside Section 256 CrPC Acquittals in Cheque-Dishonour Cases: Bombay High Court Restores Complaint with Costs

Date: Sep 10, 2025
Liberal, Natural-Justice–Centric Standard for Setting Aside Section 256 CrPC Acquittals in Cheque-Dishonour Cases: Bombay High Court Restores Complaint with Costs Case: Amit Sunarlal Shahu v. Hare...
Natural Parent’s Primacy Reaffirmed: Habeas Corpus Maintainable to Recover Minor from Grandparent Despite Pending Guardianship Proceedings

Natural Parent’s Primacy Reaffirmed: Habeas Corpus Maintainable to Recover Minor from Grandparent Despite Pending Guardianship Proceedings

Date: Sep 8, 2025
Natural Parent’s Primacy Reaffirmed: Habeas Corpus Maintainable to Recover Minor from Grandparent Despite Pending Guardianship Proceedings Introduction This commentary analyses the Bombay High...
Non‑disclosure of a trivial, time‑stale gambling conviction is not ipso facto ground for termination: Bombay High Court’s contextual, post‑sensitive test for integrity verification

Non‑disclosure of a trivial, time‑stale gambling conviction is not ipso facto ground for termination: Bombay High Court’s contextual, post‑sensitive test for integrity verification

Date: Aug 28, 2025
Non‑disclosure of a trivial, time‑stale gambling conviction is not ipso facto ground for termination: Bombay High Court’s contextual, post‑sensitive test for integrity verification Introduction In...
MIDC Allotment Exception: Bombay High Court Affirms Legality of Direct, Concessional Allotments for Educational Amenities

MIDC Allotment Exception: Bombay High Court Affirms Legality of Direct, Concessional Allotments for Educational Amenities

Date: Aug 21, 2025
MIDC Allotment Exception: Bombay High Court Affirms Legality of Direct, Concessional Allotments for Educational Amenities Introduction On 20 August 2025 the Bombay High Court (Chief Justice Alok...
“Foundation First”: Bombay High Court Mandates Specific Pleadings and Affidavit for Secondary Evidence under the Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam, 2023

“Foundation First”: Bombay High Court Mandates Specific Pleadings and Affidavit for Secondary Evidence under the Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam, 2023

Date: Aug 20, 2025
“Foundation First”: Bombay High Court Mandates Specific Pleadings and Affidavit for Secondary Evidence under the Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam, 2023 1. Introduction In Hindustan Petroleum Corporation...
No Inherent Power of Review: Bombay High Court Clarifies that Labour Courts Cannot Entertain Delay-Condonation Applications for Non-Maintainable Reviews

No Inherent Power of Review: Bombay High Court Clarifies that Labour Courts Cannot Entertain Delay-Condonation Applications for Non-Maintainable Reviews

Date: Aug 19, 2025
No Inherent Power of Review: Bombay High Court Clarifies that Labour Courts Cannot Entertain Delay-Condonation Applications for Non-Maintainable Reviews 1. Introduction This commentary examines the...
No Copyright in Film/Web-Series Titles; Producers’ Association Title Registrations Bind Only Members: Bombay High Court in Saberwal v. Star India

No Copyright in Film/Web-Series Titles; Producers’ Association Title Registrations Bind Only Members: Bombay High Court in Saberwal v. Star India

Date: Aug 19, 2025
No Copyright in Film/Web-Series Titles; Producers’ Association Title Registrations Bind Only Members: Bombay High Court in Saberwal v. Star India Court: Bombay High Court (Ordinary Original Civil...
“Normally” Means “Directory”: Bombay High Court Affirms that the Three-Month Time Limit for NSE Arbitrations Is Indicative, Not Mandatory – A Commentary on Bhanuchandra J. Doshi v. Motilal Oswal Securities Ltd. (2025)

“Normally” Means “Directory”: Bombay High Court Affirms that the Three-Month Time Limit for NSE Arbitrations Is Indicative, Not Mandatory – A Commentary on Bhanuchandra J. Doshi v. Motilal Oswal Securities Ltd. (2025)

Date: Aug 15, 2025
“Normally” Means “Directory”: Bombay High Court Affirms that the Three-Month Time Limit for NSE Arbitrations Is Indicative, Not Mandatory – A Commentary on Bhanuchandra J. Doshi v. Motilal Oswal...
Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert