Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments
  • Acts

Bombay High Court Case Commentaries

Non‑disclosure of a trivial, time‑stale gambling conviction is not ipso facto ground for termination: Bombay High Court’s contextual, post‑sensitive test for integrity verification

Non‑disclosure of a trivial, time‑stale gambling conviction is not ipso facto ground for termination: Bombay High Court’s contextual, post‑sensitive test for integrity verification

Date: Aug 28, 2025
Non‑disclosure of a trivial, time‑stale gambling conviction is not ipso facto ground for termination: Bombay High Court’s contextual, post‑sensitive test for integrity verification Introduction In...
MIDC Allotment Exception: Bombay High Court Affirms Legality of Direct, Concessional Allotments for Educational Amenities

MIDC Allotment Exception: Bombay High Court Affirms Legality of Direct, Concessional Allotments for Educational Amenities

Date: Aug 21, 2025
MIDC Allotment Exception: Bombay High Court Affirms Legality of Direct, Concessional Allotments for Educational Amenities Introduction On 20 August 2025 the Bombay High Court (Chief Justice Alok...
“Foundation First”: Bombay High Court Mandates Specific Pleadings and Affidavit for Secondary Evidence under the Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam, 2023

“Foundation First”: Bombay High Court Mandates Specific Pleadings and Affidavit for Secondary Evidence under the Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam, 2023

Date: Aug 20, 2025
“Foundation First”: Bombay High Court Mandates Specific Pleadings and Affidavit for Secondary Evidence under the Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam, 2023 1. Introduction In Hindustan Petroleum Corporation...
No Inherent Power of Review: Bombay High Court Clarifies that Labour Courts Cannot Entertain Delay-Condonation Applications for Non-Maintainable Reviews

No Inherent Power of Review: Bombay High Court Clarifies that Labour Courts Cannot Entertain Delay-Condonation Applications for Non-Maintainable Reviews

Date: Aug 19, 2025
No Inherent Power of Review: Bombay High Court Clarifies that Labour Courts Cannot Entertain Delay-Condonation Applications for Non-Maintainable Reviews 1. Introduction This commentary examines the...
No Copyright in Film/Web-Series Titles; Producers’ Association Title Registrations Bind Only Members: Bombay High Court in Saberwal v. Star India

No Copyright in Film/Web-Series Titles; Producers’ Association Title Registrations Bind Only Members: Bombay High Court in Saberwal v. Star India

Date: Aug 19, 2025
No Copyright in Film/Web-Series Titles; Producers’ Association Title Registrations Bind Only Members: Bombay High Court in Saberwal v. Star India Court: Bombay High Court (Ordinary Original Civil...
“Normally” Means “Directory”: Bombay High Court Affirms that the Three-Month Time Limit for NSE Arbitrations Is Indicative, Not Mandatory – A Commentary on Bhanuchandra J. Doshi v. Motilal Oswal Securities Ltd. (2025)

“Normally” Means “Directory”: Bombay High Court Affirms that the Three-Month Time Limit for NSE Arbitrations Is Indicative, Not Mandatory – A Commentary on Bhanuchandra J. Doshi v. Motilal Oswal Securities Ltd. (2025)

Date: Aug 15, 2025
“Normally” Means “Directory”: Bombay High Court Affirms that the Three-Month Time Limit for NSE Arbitrations Is Indicative, Not Mandatory – A Commentary on Bhanuchandra J. Doshi v. Motilal Oswal...
Mere Delivery or Billing in Mumbai Does Not Confer Jurisdiction: Bombay High Court on Trade Mark Suits, Section 134(2) TM Act and Section 20 CPC

Mere Delivery or Billing in Mumbai Does Not Confer Jurisdiction: Bombay High Court on Trade Mark Suits, Section 134(2) TM Act and Section 20 CPC

Date: Aug 12, 2025
Mere Delivery or Billing in Mumbai Does Not Confer Jurisdiction: Bombay High Court on Trade Mark Suits, Section 134(2) TM Act and Section 20 CPC Introduction This commentary examines the Bombay High...
Primacy of Pre-Independence Caste Records & Limits on the Affinity Test: Commentary on Akshata Dongare v. Caste Scrutiny Committee (2025)

Primacy of Pre-Independence Caste Records & Limits on the Affinity Test: Commentary on Akshata Dongare v. Caste Scrutiny Committee (2025)

Date: Aug 12, 2025
Primacy of Pre-Independence Caste Records & Limits on the Affinity Test Commentary on Akshata d/o Dnyaneshwar Dongare & Anr. v. Vice-Chairman, ST Caste Certificate Scrutiny Committee, Amravati (Bom...
Treasure Park Precedent: Proportional Maintenance & Delegated Registrar Powers under the Maharashtra Apartment Ownership Act, 1970

Treasure Park Precedent: Proportional Maintenance & Delegated Registrar Powers under the Maharashtra Apartment Ownership Act, 1970

Date: Aug 7, 2025
Treasure Park Precedent: Proportional Maintenance & Delegated Registrar Powers under the Maharashtra Apartment Ownership Act, 1970 1. Introduction The Bombay High Court’s decision in Mr. Sachin...
Igave v. State of Maharashtra (2025):  Technical Dismissal of a Section 18 Reference Does Not Bar Re-determination under Section 28-A of the Land Acquisition Act

Igave v. State of Maharashtra (2025): Technical Dismissal of a Section 18 Reference Does Not Bar Re-determination under Section 28-A of the Land Acquisition Act

Date: Aug 7, 2025
Technical Dismissal of a Section 18 Reference Does Not Bar Re-determination under Section 28-A — A Commentary on Sumanbai Prabhkar Igave v. State of Maharashtra & Anr., Bombay High Court, 31 July...
“No Waiver Beyond the Code” — Bombay High Court Declares Notices under S.-280 MZPPS Act & S.-180 MVPA Non-Dispensable

“No Waiver Beyond the Code” — Bombay High Court Declares Notices under S.-280 MZPPS Act & S.-180 MVPA Non-Dispensable

Date: Jul 29, 2025
“No Waiver Beyond the Code” — Bombay High Court Declares Notices under Section 280 of the Maharashtra Zilla Parishads & Panchayat Samitis Act, 1961 and Section 180 of the Maharashtra Village...
“Dynamic Statutory Reference” Doctrine: Bombay High Court Clarifies that IPC Offences in PMLA Schedule Automatically Map to Corresponding BNS Provisions

“Dynamic Statutory Reference” Doctrine: Bombay High Court Clarifies that IPC Offences in PMLA Schedule Automatically Map to Corresponding BNS Provisions

Date: Jul 10, 2025
“Dynamic Statutory Reference” Doctrine: Bombay High Court Clarifies that IPC Offences in PMLA Schedule Automatically Map to Corresponding BNS Provisions 1. Introduction On 8 July 2025, the Bombay...
“Beyond Patent Illegality” – Bombay High Court Confirms Narrow Section 34 Review & Validates Mixed-Heads Damages in Arbitration Awards

“Beyond Patent Illegality” – Bombay High Court Confirms Narrow Section 34 Review & Validates Mixed-Heads Damages in Arbitration Awards

Date: Jun 20, 2025
“Beyond Patent Illegality” – Bombay High Court Confirms Narrow Section 34 Review & Validates Mixed-Heads Damages in Arbitration Awards 1. Introduction The judgment of Chagla J. in Board of Control...
“Informed-Consent Clauses & Pre-Society Development Rights” – Commentary on Krishna Constructions v. Subhash Dalvi (Bombay HC, 2025)

“Informed-Consent Clauses & Pre-Society Development Rights” – Commentary on Krishna Constructions v. Subhash Dalvi (Bombay HC, 2025)

Date: Jun 17, 2025
“Informed-Consent Clauses & Pre-Society Development Rights” – Commentary on M/s Krishna Constructions & Ors. v. Subhash Uttam Dalvi & Ors. (Bombay High Court, Appeal From Order No. 744 of 2024,...
Sanctioned Overtime Bills Constitute a “Pre-Existing Right” – 
            Bombay High Court Re-defines the Reach of Section 33(C)(2) ID Act

Sanctioned Overtime Bills Constitute a “Pre-Existing Right” – Bombay High Court Re-defines the Reach of Section 33(C)(2) ID Act

Date: Jun 14, 2025
Sanctioned Overtime Bills Constitute a “Pre-Existing Right” – Bombay High Court Clarifies the Executory Scope of Section 33(C)(2) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 Introduction In The...
Bombay High Court Clarifies Applicability of Payment of Gratuity Act to Statutory Local Bodies and Mandates Forfeiture Assessment under Section 4(6)

Bombay High Court Clarifies Applicability of Payment of Gratuity Act to Statutory Local Bodies and Mandates Forfeiture Assessment under Section 4(6)

Date: Jun 10, 2025
Bombay High Court Clarifies Applicability of Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972 to Zilla Parishad Employees and Prescribes Mandatory Consideration of Forfeiture under Section 4(6) Introduction The Nagpur...
Bombay High Court Tightens the Specificity Requirement for Prosecuting Matrimonial Relatives under Section 498-A IPC

Bombay High Court Tightens the Specificity Requirement for Prosecuting Matrimonial Relatives under Section 498-A IPC

Date: Jun 10, 2025
Bombay High Court Tightens the Specificity Requirement for Prosecuting Matrimonial Relatives under Section 498-A IPC Introduction In Sandeep s/o Devidas Aware v. State of Maharashtra & Anr. (Criminal...
Breach of Lease Covenant Does Not Void Leasehold Mortgage: MIDC v. Union Bank of India

Breach of Lease Covenant Does Not Void Leasehold Mortgage: MIDC v. Union Bank of India

Date: May 27, 2025
Breach of Lease Covenant Does Not Void Leasehold Mortgage: MIDC v. Union Bank of India Introduction This landmark decision of the Bombay High Court in Maharashtra Industrial Development Corporation...
“Long Unauthorized Absence = Voluntary Abandonment” – Bombay High Court Redefines Retrenchment Threshold under the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947

“Long Unauthorized Absence = Voluntary Abandonment” – Bombay High Court Redefines Retrenchment Threshold under the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947

Date: May 10, 2025
“Long Unauthorized Absence = Voluntary Abandonment” – Bombay High Court Redefines Retrenchment Threshold under the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 1. Introduction In a consolidated decision covering...
Reinforcing the Bona Fide Remorse Standard and Deterrent Punishment in Criminal Contempt Proceedings

Reinforcing the Bona Fide Remorse Standard and Deterrent Punishment in Criminal Contempt Proceedings

Date: Apr 24, 2025
Reinforcing the Bona Fide Remorse Standard and Deterrent Punishment in Criminal Contempt Proceedings Introduction In the suo motu criminal contempt petition High Court of Judicature at Bombay on its...
Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert